Money is a huge issue for couples, so big it may be more important than communication. Fights about money seem to be more intense than most other topics and about one third of couples coming for counselling are having financial distress.
So, if money is such a problem for couples, should couples just try to make more money or is there something else to focus on? A researcher from Kansas recently investigated what factors mattered the most to couples.
It is important for couples to have similar views on money and shared goals. It has been shown that couples need to respect each other’s goals and dreams. They don’t necessarily need to agree with their partner’s dream, but they need support it. It is important to get on the “same team.” This can be boiled down to respect. It is important to respect each other even though each person is different. Respect has actually been found to be associated with martial satisfaction in general, not just in the area of money.
It seems it is also important for couples to have similar views on autonomy or independence with money. Sometimes couples give each other a lot of autonomy, sometimes there are limits on what can be spent without consulting or strict budgets. People in a relationship need to feel on the same page when it comes to how free they are to make their own financial decisions. This doesn’t mean that couples need to give each other more autonomy, just that they need to agree on the limits.
Satisfying Financial Roles
This research also asked about all the different financial responsibilities that the each member of the couple does (e.g., bookkeeping, taxes, bill payment, etc.). After they looked at all of these tasks they found that the actual tasks weren’t that important. What was important was the level of satisfaction each person had with the tasks they were responsible for. So it doesn’t matter who keeps the books as long as that person feels good about doing it.
Income, Kids, and Experience
It seemed that level of income was an important factor in financial satisfaction. Making more money helped. Having enough money to meet obligations was important. It also helped if the kids were out of the house. When the kids leave, there is more disposable income and ability to save.
It was also better for couples who had been together longer. Having experience was a good thing. Sometimes it just takes a while to learn about how you work as a couple.
It is important for couples to have their views on finances figured out. In fact, it can be more important than communication. Feeling good about your money isn’t just about having enough, it is important to respect each others goals, values, and figure out financial roles. Getting all of this straight can be tricky, our feelings about money and how it should be spent can run deep. Being patient, understanding, and respecting each other’s goals is key. It is good to know that these issues get better over time – experience makes a difference.
By Dr. Syras Derksen
Archuleta, K. L. (2013). Couples, money, and expectations: Negotiating financial management roles to increase relationship satsifaction. Marriage & Family Review, 49, 391-411.
It is hard for young men to cry. Research has shown that crying is thought of as a female expression. Expectations for how men grieve are keenly felt. The influence of our culture can be so extreme that some men truly feel they are physically unable to produce tears in response to grief.
I’m going to a funeral tomorrow for an aunt who died suddenly of cancer. I have not cried and I wonder how much of this has to do with me and how much is because of our culture. If I won’t cry, how will I grieve?
I recently found an article that attempted to answer this question by interviewing 25 young men who had recently lost a male friend to a non-health related accident (e.g., car accident, drug overdose, etc.). From these interviews, a few themes came to the surface.
One young man's friend died at an after graduation party. They had been in the back of a van and at a stop on the road when they saw some friends on the sidewalk. His friend got out of the van and ran to the sidewalk, but as he crossed into the next lane he was hit by a bus. The accident happened in full view of his friends in the bus and on the sidewalk. In the interview, this young man described feeling shock after the incident and then passivity - there was nothing he could do. To describe his feelings he took a picture of an empty bucket on its side. With no action to be taken and no appropriate emotional response, all that was left was a feeling of emptiness.
For men, anger is one of the culturally acceptable responses to loss. Even violence is accepted in some circumstances. It is believed that men sometimes can't control their anger.
One of the young men being interviewed told the story of his friend who had been in a domestic disturbance. The police responded to the incident and shot his friend. During the interview he gripped the table in his anger. He had considered acting out in revenge, but hadn’t taken his anger that far.
“It’s a stupid male thing, but because it was a violent death, I felt a lot of retribution and revenge. I was consumed with anger and the [girls] went straight to sadness, not all the anger and stuff.”
Some of the young men did express sadness, but not many. Those who did usually had cultural influences that were non-western. For example, perhaps their parents had immigrated from another country. The sadness these men expressed seemed to come from unfinished business. They also sometimes felt that they could have done something to prevent the death. This left them dwelling in regret.
These three expressions of grief (emptiness, anger, and sadness) seemed to stem from three primary identities. The first of these identities is the "adventurer." The young men who seemed to follow this pattern defined their lives primarily by their pursuit of new experiences. They had little attachment to any one person, place, or thing. Their lives were founded on freedom. The idea of mourning with friends was considered a suffocating experience.
One young man’s friend died while he was traveling. He was struck with sadness and felt like his friend was “far away.” He decided that engaging in a new adventure through his continued travels was the best way to honour his friend. These individuals were primarily isolated, although they had short superficial relationships with co-adventurers, and their actions could seem insensitive to others.
The Father Figure
This identity was quite different from the adventurer. They focused on responsibility, loyalty, and protection instead of experience. These men felt they were successful if they maintained a strong family network, provided for their families, and achieved academically or in their work.
In grief these men thought of their role as supporting others who were left behind, particularly women. They felt they had to be strong, and part of that meant not showing emotion. Showing emotion was thought of as making it more difficult for others to contain or manage their emotions.
“You don’t want to trigger other people. When they’re trying to deal with [things differently]... you don’t want to, you know, step on boundaries.”
There was also a small group of men who seemed to have a re-birth after the death of their friend. The death was a wake up call from a dangerous or unmeaningful life. These young men resolved to change their lives and help others. In a way, this was like using their own life as a lamp to help direct others away from their own mistakes.
One young man who was addicted to alcohol had a friend die of a drug overdose. His friend’s death made him question his life. He decided he wanted to help others like his friend who had died.
“I just wanted to be happy and touch other people like [his friend] that are going through a hard time and let them know that it’s not as bad as it seems.”
After reading this study I could see myself in some of the descriptions. I could empathise with the emptiness and the feelings of responsibility some of these young men experienced. Our culture has certainly limited men’s ability to express themselves, and men have had to adapt the way they manage their emotions. Sometimes this happens in ways that are more constructive than others. Hopefully being aware of this grief process will help men to find peace and help those around them to understand their journey.
By Dr. Syras Derksen
Creighton, G., Oliffe, J. L., Butterwick, S., & Saewic, E. (2013). After the death of a friend: Young men’s grief and masculine identities. Social Science and Medicine, 84, 35-43.
We can now see narcissism in the brain. Brain scans of people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) showed they have less brain matter in areas associated with emotional empathy. This is the first time anyone has seen the evidence of narcissism in brain structures.
The inability to feel empathy is one of the hallmarks of NPD. Researchers have found that people with this disorder can take the perspective of another person in a purely intellectual way. However, when it comes to actually feeling what another person is going through, narcissists have difficulty.
A group of German researchers recently studied the source of this lack of emotional empathy in people with NPD. In their research, they collected MRI brain scans of 17 people with NPD along with 17 people from the community for comparison. The researchers first looked at brain volume overall and found that the people with NPD were similar to the healthy individuals. That is, both groups’ brains’ were similar overall.
The researchers then examined the areas of the brain that are now considered areas associated with empathy (i.e., bilateral anterior insula, anterior and median parts of the cingulate cortex, and the supplementary motor area). They found that the patients with NPD had less brain matter in areas that overlapped with the areas associated with empathy (i.e., left anterior insula, rostral and median cingulate cortex as well as dorsolateral and medial parts of the prefrontal cortex).
Put simply, the empathic areas of the brain were less developed in people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
Narcissistic Personality Disorder affects about 1% of the general population and it has been shown to impair interpersonal functioning. This groundbreaking research will likely help legitimize the disorder and, ironically, help people to empathize with people who are suffering with this illness.
By Dr. Syras Derksen
Schulze, L., Dziobek, I., Vater, A., Heekeren, H. R., Bajbouj, M., Renneberg, B., Heuser, I., & Roepke, S. (2013). Gray matter abnormalities in patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 1363-1369. (http://www.journalofpsychiatricresearch.com/article/S0022-3956%2813%2900157-X/abstract)